So the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

isn't irredeemably evil. A very interesting firearms decision.

All right (note the 2 'l's and the space) I'll save ya the work of clicking through - from the decision:

"...there is no evidence that section 922(o) was enacted to regulate commercial aspects of the machinegun business. More likely, section 922(o) was intended to keep machineguns out of the hands of criminals—an admirable goal, but not a commercial one." . . .