A Letter on Reparations from Edwin Locke

of the Ayn Rand Institute:

A Chicago federal judge was right to dismiss a lawsuit brought by
descendants of slaves against corporations that profited from slavery
in the 19th century, but the decision did not go far enough. The judge
left the door open for further litigation, by implying that it might
be legitimate if the plaintiffs could show actual links to the
companies in question. No such door should have been left open,
because such lawsuits are without merit in principle.

Slavery was abolished in the United States nearly 140 years ago. Those
who were slaves are long dead. If claims could be made by anyone who
had long-dead relatives who were harmed by someone, then everyone in
the entire world could claim compensation for such victimization. But
people who were not themselves the object of harm have no right to
make any such claim.

And who would be responsible for such unjust compensatory payments?
People who are now living who had no role in causing the harm. If
people who were not themselves harmed can force people who were not
responsible for any harm to pay them "compensation" for the suffering
endured by others, then the result is not justice but a double
injustice.

Edwin A. Locke
Ayn Rand Institute

2121 Alton Parkway, #250
Irvine, CA 92606
United States
(949) 222-6550 ext 226