On that, here's a quote from the great co-discoverer of Marginal Utility, William Stanley Jevons,
It would not be easy to say offhand whether every action which is not honest is dishonest, or whether there may not be actions of an intermediate character. The rule is that wherever the question is one of degree or quantity a medium is possible, and the subject belongs rather to the science of quantity than to simple logic; where the question is one of the presence or absence of a quality, there cannot be more than two alternatives…
That's from Elementary Lessons in Logic. The best way to get it is google it. The Mises Institute has it as a free PDF. The quote is from page 24.
So here's where I'm at:
Brutal honesty requires me not to accept belief in things for which there is no, or insufficient, evidence. So, I don't accept fallacious arguments for anything supernatural, nor have I ever seen non-fallacious arguments for them. What I'd like to be the case has no bearing on what is real.
So they call me an atheist.
I don't respect claims to authority by those who haven't demonstrated their expertise, whether they be teachers, presidents, kings, UN Secretary Generals, any member of any hierarchy (bureaucrats, middle-managers, etc), police, soldiers, prophets, priests or parents. Or siblings.
Respect at a job requires competence at that job. Competence (or even brilliance or genius) at one job, does not imply competence at anything else. Newbs who won't train must be fired.
Most of those jobs above are too broad in their attempted scope to allow for any training whatsoever. The jobs for which training is actually possible are the ones that are actually useful and their current organization in hierarchies must be reorganized so as to remove control from power and glory grubbers who lie about the value of their contributions.
The basic principle of that reorganization is the Non-Aggression Principle.
So they call me and anarchist and anti-family. I'll wear the first two labels, atheist and anarchist, with some degree of pride, though they're not perfectly accurate. I don't like agnostic, because it gives the illusion of respect to theists. Faith is not respectable whether it's in God, government, ghosts, ufos or Dialectical Materialism.